German Pension Reform Plan Deepens Rifts: Unions, Employers, and Politicians Clash Over Retirement Age and Capital Fund

The most contentious element of Germany’s proposed pension overhaul is a new state-sponsored capital fund that would require equal contributions from workers and employers. Rainer Dulger, president of the Confederation of German Employers’ Associations (BDA), warns that the extra 2% payroll levy would saddle companies with an additional €40 billion in costs. The warning came just days after a government-appointed commission delivered 33 reform recommendations on June 22, which Chancellor Merz and Labour Minister Bas have vowed to implement in full.

Dulger’s opposition puts him at odds with some business groups. Peter Adrian, head of the German Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DIHK), praised the planned end to early retirement, arguing it could save the system roughly €10 billion annually. The Federation of German Industries (BDI) likewise sees a chance to slow the rise in non-wage labour costs. Yet Dulger’s stance reflects a wider rift: the German Actuarial Association and the German Insurance Association both favour expanding private and occupational pension models instead of the proposed public capital fund.

Labour Leaders Condemn Changes as an Attack on Worker Dignity

Trade unions have lined up squarely against the commission’s core proposals. Frank Werneke, chairman of the Verdi union, told phoenix on Tuesday that any reform must not be pushed through against the interests of contributors. He demands an absolute guarantee that the statutory pension level never falls below 48% of average earnings. Werneke also fears the planned paritarian capital pension would put pressure on existing occupational pension schemes.

DGB chairwoman Yasmin Fahimi called the proposed abolition of the deduction-free pension after 45 years of contributions — often referred to as the “pension at 63” — a mistake. Werneke echoed that sentiment, describing the end of the 45-year rule as a disregard for workers’ life achievements.

Political Pushback from Within the Coalition

The reform also faces resistance from state-level leaders of the Social Democrats (SPD). Manuela Schwesig, the premier of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, opposes a one-to-one adoption of the commission’s plan and criticises the proposed coupling of the retirement age with life expectancy. Bavaria’s CSU chief Markus Söder, meanwhile, has attacked the near-abolition of mini-jobs, which would remain accessible only to school pupils.

Despite the growing chorus of critics, Chancellor Merz and Minister Bas insist the package remains a “total work of art”. A parliamentary vote is expected in the autumn.

Core Elements of the Reform

The commission’s blueprint for securing the system through 2041 includes:

• Retirement age: From 2031, the entry age will be linked to life expectancy, rising to 67.5 by 2041.
• Expanded membership: Civil servants, members of parliament and the self-employed would be required to contribute to the statutory pension insurance.
• Capital pension: From 2028, a funded supplementary pension financed stepwise by a paritarian 2% contribution.
• Mini-jobs: Broadly phased out, with access limited to students only — a move that has drawn fire from CSU leader Söder.

Professor Jörg Rocholl, a member of the pension commission, defended the design. He noted that a transitional factor ensures the 48% pension-level floor in the short term. Long-term, the commission aims for an old-age income of 70% of net earnings. But with unions, parts of the business community and key politicians all demanding renegotiation, the path to passage looks far from smooth.

en | boerse | 69615566 |